Towards a digital post-capitalism: contributions from the social and solidarity economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.10647Keywords:
social and solidarity economy, digital capitalism, digital commons, platform cooperatives, co-productionAbstract
This article proposes that the social and solidarity economy model and the notion of «co-production» can serve as a framework for integrating public policy, digital commons, civil society action and cooperative platforms in a way that moves towards a post-capitalist digital sphere that contributes to a just and sustainable transition. First, the article reviews the main challenges that a just and sustainable ecosocial transition would encounter in the digital sphere. Then, it examines various proposals for transforming the digital sphere in a post-capitalist direction. Finally, it suggests that the social and solidarity economy can serve as a framework to integrate these diverse proposals and create synergies among them.
Display downloads
References
ARNOLD E, PAUNOV C, PLANES-SATORRA S, ET AL. (2023). Navigating green and digital transitions: five imperatives for effective STI policy. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/navigating-green-and-digital-transitions_dffb0747-en, acceso 11 de noviembre de 2024.
BIRCH K, CHIAPPETTA M, ARTYUSHINA A (2020). The problem of innovation in technoscientific capitalism: data rentiership and the policy implications of turning personal digital data into a private asset. Policy Studies 41(5):468-487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2020.1748264
BÜHLER MM, CALZADA I, CANE I, ET AL. (2023). Unlocking the Power of Digital Commons: Data Cooperatives as a Pathway for Data Sovereign, Innovative and Equitable Digital Communities. Digital 3(3):3. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, pp. 146-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/digital3030011
CANCELA E (2023) Utopías digitales. Verso Libros.
CHRISTIAENS T (2022). Digital Working Lives: Worker Autonomy and the Gig Economy. Rowman & Littlefield, Londres. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9781538173749
CHRISTIAENS T (2023). Worker Co-Operatives for the 21st Century. Critical Sociology 49(1):157-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205221085796
CHRISTIAENS T (2024). Platform cooperativism and freedom as non-domination in the gig economy. European Journal of Political Theory 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851241227121, acceso 14 de enero de 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14748851241227121
CIGNA L, FISCHER T, ABUANNAB EH, ET AL. (2023). Varieties of Just Transition? Eco-Social Policy Approaches at the International Level. Social Policy and Society 22(4):730-746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746423000192
COHEN J, ROGERS J (1992). Secondary Associations and Democratic Governance. Politics & Society 20(4):393-472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329292020004003
COMISIÓN MUNDIAL SOBRE EL MEDIO AMBIENTE Y EL DESARROLLO (1988). Nuestro futuro común. Alianza Editorial.
CORAGGIO L (2016). La economía social y solidaria (ESS): niveles y alcances de acción de sus actores. El papel de las universidades. En: Carlos Puig (coord.). Economía Social y Solidaria: conceptos, prácticas y políticas públicas. Hegoa-Universidad del País Vasco.
CORNFORTH C (1995). Patterns of Cooperative Management: Beyond the Degeneration Thesis. Economic and Industrial Democracy 16(4):487-523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X95164002
COULDRY N, MEJIAS UA (2019). Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject. Television & New Media 20(4):336-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632
DAHLBERG L (2009). Libertarian Cyber-Utopianism and Global Digital Networks. En: Hayden P, el-Ojeili C (eds.). Globalization and Utopia: Critical Essays. Palgrave Macmillan UK, Londres, pp. 176-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230233607_12
DAUVERGNE P (2022). Is artificial intelligence greening global supply chains? Exposing the political economy of environmental costs. Review of International Political Economy 29(3):696-718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1814381
DEGRYSE C (2022). (Re)inventing the collective dimension in a «virtualised» labour market. En: Ness I (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of the Gig Economy. Routledge, Londres. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003161875-9
DUBAL V (2017). Wage slave or entrepreneur?: contesting the dualism of legal worker identities. California Law Review 105(1):65-123.
DURAND C (2022). Scouting Capital Frontiers. Reply to Morozov’s «Critique of Techno-Feudal Reason». New Left Review 29-39.
FEOLA G (2020). Capitalism in sustainability transitions research: time for a critical turn? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 35:241-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.02.005
FORAMITTI J, VARVAROUSIS A, KALLIS G (2020). Transition within a transition: how cooperative platforms want to change the sharing economy. Sustainability Science 15(4):1185-1197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00804-y
FORBES (2024). Top 10 biggest companies in the world by market cap in 2024. https://www.forbesindia.com/article/explainers/top-10-largest-companies-world-market-cap/86341/1, acceso 30 de mayo de 2024.
FUCHS C (2014). Social Media: A Critical Introduction. Sage, Newcastle. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270066
FUCHS C (2021). Social Media: A Critical Introduction. Sage, Newcastle. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003199182-1
GEELS FW (2019). Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: a review of criticisms and elaborations of the Multi-Level Perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 39. Open Issue 2019:187-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.009
GERBER C (2022). Gender and precarity in platform work: old inequalities in the new world of work. New Technology, Work and Employment 37:206-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12233
GREENPEACE (2020). How Tech Companies are Helping Big Oil Profit from Climate Destruction.
GUDYNAS E (2015). Derechos de la Naturaleza: ética biocéntrica y políticas ambientales. Editorial Abya-Yala.
GURUMURTHY A, CHAMI N (2022). Governing the Resource of Data: To What End and for Whom? Conceptual Building Blocks of a Semi-Commons Approach. Data Governance Network Working Paper 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4037323
GUTTMANN A (2021). Commons and cooperatives: a new governance of collective action. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 92(1):33-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12291
HABERMAS J (2023) New Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere and Deliberative Politics. John Wiley & Sons.
HARVEY D (2004). El nuevo imperialismo. Ediciones Akal, Madrid.
JESSOP B (2018). El Estado. Los Libros de la Catarata, Madrid.
JOHNSTONE P, NEWELL P (2018). Sustainability transitions and the state. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 27:72-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.006
KALLIS G, DEMARIA F, BAKKER K (2019). Geographies of degrowth: nowtopias, resurgences and the decolonization of imaginaries and places. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 2(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619869689
KASPARIAN D (2021). Co-Operative Struggles: Work Conflicts in Argentina’s New Worker Co-Operatives. Brill, Boston. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004468641
KWET M (2022). The Digital Tech Deal: a socialist framework for the twenty-first century. Race & Class 63(3):63-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03063968211064478
LAVILLE JL (2016). La economía social y solidaria frente a las políticas públicas. En: Carlos Puig (coord.). Economía Social y Solidaria: conceptos, prácticas y políticas públicas. Hegoa-Universidad del País Vasco.
LAZZARATO M (2020). Signos y máquinas. El capitalismo y la producción de la subjetividad. Enclave de Libros, Madrid.
LLOREDO LA (2022). Los bienes comunes naturales en el proceso constituyente chileno. Viento Sur 184.
LOORBACH D, FRANTZESKAKI N, AVELINO F (2017). Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340
MACDONALD R, GIAZITZOGLU A (2019). Youth, enterprise and precarity: or, what is, and what is wrong with, the «gig economy»? Journal of Sociology 55(4):724-740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783319837604
MAZZUCATO M (2016). El Estado emprendedor: mitos del sector público frente al privado. RBA, Barcelona.
MAZZUCATO M (2021). Misión economía: una guía para cambiar el capitalismo. Taurus, Madrid.
MAZZUCATO M, ENTSMINGER J, KATTEL R, MOORE M, TAMBINI D (2021). Reshaping platform-driven digital markets. En: Moore M, Tambini D (eds.). Regulating Big Tech: Policy Responses to Digital Dominance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 17-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197616093.003.0002
MEZZADRA S, NEILSON B (2024). The Rest and the West: Capital and Power in a Multipolar World. Verso Books.
MOORE S, ROBERTS A (2022). The Rise of Ecofascism: Climate Change and the Far Right. John Wiley & Sons, Nueva Jersey.
MOROZOV E (2013). To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. PublicAffairs, Nueva York.
MOROZOV E (2022). Crítica de la razón tecnofeudal. New Left Review 133/134:99-141.
NUSSBAUM M (2003). Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice. Feminist Economics 9(2-3):33-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570022000077926
O’NEIL C (2018). Armas de destrucción matemática: cómo el Big Data aumenta la desigualdad y amenaza la democracia. Capitán Swing Libros, Madrid.
O’NEIL M, CAI X, MUSELLI L, PAILLER F, ZACCHIROLI S (2021). The coproduction of open source software by volunteers and big tech firms. Report, 9 June. News and Media Research Centre.
OIT (2023). Generative AI and jobs: a global analysis of potential effects on job quantity and quality. ILO Working Paper 96.
OSTROM E (2009). El gobierno de los bienes comunes: la evolución de las instituciones de acción colectiva. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
PAPADIMITROPOULOS V, MALAMIDIS H (2024). The Transformative Potential of Platform Cooperativism: The Case of CoopCycle. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 22(1):1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v22i1.1418
PASQUALE F (2015). Black Box Society. Harvard University Press, Harvard. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674736061
PHILLIPS R, PYLE J, PALAN R (2021). The Amazon Method: how to take advantage of the international state system to avoid paying tax. Study for the Left in the European Parliament.
PIASNA A, DRAHOKOUPIL J (2017). Gender inequalities in the new world of work. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 23:313-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258917713839
POLANYI K (2008). El sistema económico como proceso institucionalizado. En: Entre las gracias y el molino satánico: lecturas de antropología económica. UNED, pp. 233-260.
PUGA BP, SAES BM, CECHIN AD (2022). Green New Deal para ellos y Same Old Deal para nosotros. Implicaciones de la agenda de transición verde para Brasil. Ecología Política (64):81-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53368/EP64NPVbr03
RAVENELLE AJ (2019) Hustle and Gig: Struggling and Surviving in the Sharing Economy. University of California Press, Berkeley, Oakland (California). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520971899
RENDUELES C (2015). Sociofobia: el cambio político en la era de la utopía digital. Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial México, México DF.
RENDUELES C (2024). Comuntopía. Comunes, poscapitalismo y transición ecosocial. Akal, Madrid.
RIKAP C (2021). Capitalism, Power and Innovation: Intellectual Monopoly Capitalism Uncovered. Routledge, Londres. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429341489
ROCKSTRÖM J (2015). Bounding the Planetary Future: Why We Need a Great Transition. Great Transition Initiative.
ROSENBLAT A (2018). Uberland: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Rules of Work. University of California Press, Berkeley, Oakland (California). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520970632
SANDOVAL M (2016). What would Rosa do? Co-operatives and radical politics. Soundings: A Journal of Politics and Culture 63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3898/136266216819377039
SANDOVAL M (2020). Entrepreneurial Activism? Platform Cooperativism between Subversion and Co-optation. Critical Sociology 46(6):801-817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920519870577
SCALZINI S (2021). Economic Dependence in Digital Markets: EU Remedies and Tools. Market and Competition Law Review 5:81.
SCHILLER D (1999). Digital Capitalism: Networking the Global Market System. MIT Press, Massachusetts. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2415.001.0001
SCHMIDT E (2023). Innovation Power: Why Technology Will Define the Future of Geopolitics. Foreign Affairs 102:38.
SCHOLZ RT (2023). Own This!: How Platform Cooperatives Help Workers Build a Democratic Internet. Verso Books.
SHULZ S (2024). Moving from coproduction to commonization of digital public goods and services. Public Administration Review (preprint). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13795
SHULZ S, O’NEIL M, BROCA S, ET AL. (2024). Digital Commons for the Ecological Transition: Ethics, Praxis and Policies. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 22(1):348-365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v22i1.1456
SRNICEK N (2017). The challenges of platform capitalism: understanding the logic of a new business model. Juncture 23(4):254-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/newe.12023
SRNICEK N, WILLIAMS A (2017). Inventar el futuro: poscapitalismo y un mundo sin trabajo. Malpaso Ediciones, Barcelona.
STEINHOFF J (2021). Automation and Autonomy: Labour, Capital and Machines in the Artificial Intelligence Industry. Springer Nature, Berlín. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71689-9
TARRANT A, COWEN T (2022). Big Tech Lobbying in the EU. The Political Quarterly 93(2):218-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13127
TOOZE A (2022). Welcome to the world of the polycrisis. Financial Times, 28 de octubre. https://www.ft.com/content/498398e7-11b1-494b-9cd3-6d669dc3de33, acceso 30 de mayo de 2024.
TOWNSEND JH, COROAMA VC (2018). Digital Acceleration of Sustainability Transition: The Paradox of Push Impacts. Sustainability 10(8):8. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082816
TRANSNATIONAL INSTITUTE (2023). Geopolitics of Digital Power. https://www.tni.org/en/geopolitics-of-digital-power, acceso 30 de mayo de 2024.
UNCTAD (2021). Digital Economic Report 2021. Naciones Unidas.
VAILLANCOURT Y (2009). Social Economy in the Co-Construction of Public Policy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 80(2):275-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2009.00387.x
VAN DOORN N (2017). Platform labour: on the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the on-demand’s economy. Information, Communication & Society 20(6):898-914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1294194
VAROUFAKIS Y (2023). Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism. Vintage, Nueva York.
VASUDEVAN R (2022). Digital platforms: Monopoly capital through a classical-marxian lens. Cambridge Journal of Economics 46(6):1269-1288. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beac045, acceso 14 de enero de 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beac045
VERSCHUERE B, BRANDSEN T, PESTOFF V (2012). Co-production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 23(4):1083-1101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8
WADLEY D (2021). Technology, capital substitution and labor dynamics: global workforce disruption in the 21st century? Futures 132:102802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102802
WALSH S (2023). Marx, subsumption and the critique of innovation. Organization 30(2). SAGE Publications Ltd., pp. 345-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084211015377
WOOD AJ, GRAHAM M, LEHDONVIRTA V, ET AL. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society 33(1):56-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616
ZUBOFF S (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Profile Books, Londres.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mikel Barba-Del Horno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Accepted 2025-01-07
Published 2025-05-06
