Authorial Intention in Literary Hermeneutics: On Two American Theories

José Ángel García Landa

doi:10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.199111819

Autores/as

José Ángel García Landa Universidad de Zaragoza

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.199111819

Resumen

--

Mostras las descargas

Los datos de descarga todavía no están disponibles.

Referencias

BAL, Mieke. 1985. Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto: U of Toronto P.

BARTHES, Roland. 1977. «The Death of the Author.» 1968. In Barthes, Image - Music - Text. New York: Hill and Wang. 142-48.

BATESON, F. W. 1953. «The Function of Criticism at the Present Time.» Essays in Criticism 3 (1953): 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eic/III.1.1

BEARDSLEY, Monroe C. 1970. The Possibility of Criticism. Detroit: Wayne State UP.

BLANCHOT, Maurice. 1955. L' Espace littéraire. Paris: Gallimard.

BOECKH, A. 1877. Enzyklopádie und Methodologie der Philologischen Wissenschaften. Leipzig.

CIOFFI, Frank. 1976. «Intention and Interpretation in Criticism.» Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 64 (1963-64): 85-106. Rpt. in Newton-De Molina 1976: 55-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/64.1.85

CLOSE, A.J. 1976. «Don Quixote and the “Intentionalist Fallacy.’» British Journal of Aesthetics 12.1 (1972): 19-39. Rpt. in Newton-De Molina 1976: 174-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/12.1.19

CRANE, R. S. 1953. The Languages of Criticism and the Structure of. Poetry. Toronto: U of Toronto P. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442653252

DE MAN, Paul. 1983. Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. 1971. 2nd. ed. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P.

DENNETT, Daniel C. 1978. Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology. Montgomery (VT): Bradford.

---. 1987. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge (MA): M.LT. Press.

DERRIDA, Jacques. 1967. De la grammatologie. Paris: Minuit.

---. 1988. Limited Inc. Evanston: Northwestern UP.

DEWEY, John. 1934. Art as Experience. New York.

FIEDLER, Leslie A. 1952. «Archetype and Signature: A Study of the Relationship Between Biography and Poetry.» Sewanee Review 60 (1952): 253-273.

FISH, Stanley E. 1967. Surprised by Sin: The Reader in Paradise Lost. London: Macmillan; New York: St. Martin's. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-00146-0

---. 1980. Is There a Text in this Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge (MA): Harvard UP.

FOWLER, Alastair. 1976. «Intention Floreat.» In Newton-De Molina 1976: 242-255.

FRYE, Northrop. 1957. Anatomy of Criticism. Princeton: Princeton UP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400866908

GADAMER, Hans-Georg. 1977. Verdad y método: Fundamentos de una hermenéutica filosófica. Trans. Ana Agud Aparicio and Rafael de Agapito. Salamanca: Sígueme. Trans. of Wahrheit und Methode. 1960. 4th ed. Túbingen: Mohr, 1975.

---. 1988. «The Hermeneutics of Suspicion.» In Shapiro and Sica 1988: 54-65.

GARCÍA LANDA, José Angel. 1989. «Reading Racism: The Assumption of Authorial Intentions in Stephen Crane’s ‘The Monster.» Miscelánea 10: 63-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.198911571

GREIMAS, A. J. 1966. Sémantique structurale. Paris: Larousse.

HARRIS, Wendell V. 1988. Interpretive Acts: In Search of Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon.

HERMEDEN, Goren. 1975. «Intention and Interpretation in Literary Criticism.» New Literary History 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/468278

HIRSCH, E.D., Jr. 1967. Validity in Interpretation. New Haven: Yale UP.

---. 1976. The Aims of Interpretation. Chicago: U of Chicago P.

HORTON, Susan R. 1979. Interpreting Interpreting: Interpreting Dickens’ Dombey. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.

INGARDEN, Roman. 1973. The Literary Work of Art: An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic, and Theory of Literature. Trans. George G. Grabowicz. Evanston: Northwestern UP. Trans. of Das Literarische Kunstwerk. 1931.3rd ed. Túbingen: Niemeyer, 1965.

MICHAELS, Walter Benn. 1980. «The Interpreter’s Self: Peirce on the Cartesian ‘Subject.’» Georgia Review 31 (1977): 383-402. Rpt. in Tompkins 1980: 185-200.

NEWTON-DE MOLINA, David, ed. 1976. On Literary Intention. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP. (Introduction, vii-xvii).

PALMER, Richard. 1969. Hermeneutics. Evanston: Northwestern UP.

PECKHAM, Morse. 1976. «The Intentional? Fallacy?» New Orleans Review 1 (1969): 116-164, Rpt. in Newton-De Molina 1976: 139-157.

POULET, Georges. 1980. «Criticism and the Experience of Interiority.» 1972. Rpt. in Tompkins 1980: 41-49.

PRATT, Mary Louise. 1977. Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse. Bloomington: Indiana UP.

RAVAL, Suresh. 1981. Metacriticism. Athens (GA): U of Georgia P.

REDPATH, Theodore. 1976. «The Meaning of a Poem.» In British Philosophers of the Mid-Century: A Cambridge Symposium. Ed. C.A. Mace. London: Allen & Unwin, 1957. Rpt. in Newton-De Molina 1976: 14-25.

ROBSON, W. W. 1966. Critical Essays. London.

ROMA, Emilio, III. 1976. «The Scope of the Intentional Fallacy.» Monist 50.2 ( 1966): 250-66. Rpt. in Newton-De Molina 1976: 74-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist196650220

SAUSSURE, Ferdinand de. 1949. Cours de linguistique générale. 1915. Ed. Charles Bally, Albert Sechehaye and Albert Riedlinger. Paris: Payot, 1949.

SCHLEIERMACHER, Friedrich. 1986. Hermeneutics: The Handwritten Manuscripts. Ed. Heinz Kimmerle. Trans. James Duke and Jack Forstman. Atlanta: Scholars Press. Trans. of Hermeneutik and related writings. 1805-33.

SCHOLES, Robert. 1990. «Interpretation: The Question of Protocols.» In Robert Scholes, Protocols of Reading. New Haven: Yale UP. 50-88. .

SEARLE, JohnR. 1983a. Intentionality:An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173452

---. 1983b. «The World Turned Upside Down.» New York Review of Books 30.16 (27 oct.): 74-79.

SEGRE, Cesare. 1985. Principios de análisis del texto literario. Barcelona: Crítica.

SHAPIRO, Gary, and Alan Sica, eds. 1988. Hermeneutics: Questions and Prospects. 1984. Amherst: U of Massachusetts P.

SKINNER, Quentin. 1976. «Motives, Intentions and the Interpretation of Texts.» New Literary History 3.2 (1972): 393-408. Rpt. in Newton-De Molina 1976: 210-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/468322

SONTAG, Susan. 1966. Against Interpretation. New York: Noonday.

SPARSHOTT, F. E. 1976. «Criticism and Performance.» In Sparshott, The Concept of Criticism. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1967. 162-177. Rpt. in Newton-De Molina 1976: 104-115.

SPIVAK, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988 .In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics. New York: Routledge.

TOMPKINS, Jane P., ed. 1980. Reader-Response Criticism: From Formalism to Post-Structuralism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP. Introduction, ix-xxvi.

WATSON, George. 1976. «The Literary Past.» In Watson, The Study of Literature. London: Allen Lane, 1969. 66-83. Rpt. in Newton-De Molina 1976, 158-173.

WELLEK, René. «A Rejoinder to Gerald Graff.» Critical Inquiry 5 (1979). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/448008

WIMSATT, W.K. 1976. «Genesis: A Fallacy Revisited.» In The Disciplines of Criticism: Essays in Literary Theory, Interpretation and History. Eds. Peter Demetz, Thomas Greene and Lowry Nelson, Jr. New Haven: Yale UP,1968. 193-225. Rpt. in Newton-De Molina 1976: 116-138.

---, and Monroe C. Beardsley. 1967. «The Intentional Fallacy.» Sewanee Review 54 (1 946). Rpt. in Wimsatt, The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry. 1954. Lexington: U of Kentucky P. 2-18.