City, Landscape, Infrastructure. Experimental fields in the dispersed metropolis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_zarch/zarch.20242310392Keywords:
infrastructure, landscape, public space, densification, urban metabolism, RomeAbstract
The reactivation interventions of peripheral urban stations represent an important opportunity for urban regeneration and, more generally, offer a significant case study to develop reflections on the contemporary city dimension, on the meaning of public space, and on the role of urban design. The linear infrastructural system that spreads throughout the territory, the marginal spaces between the islands of the dispersed city, and the nodes that interconnect them constitute the urban materials at our disposal to trigger broader transformations on the territory and to define new relationships among city, landscape, and infrastructure.
From this perspective, Rome and its peri-urban landscape offer an exceptional testing ground. At the porous boundary between city and countryside, Rome reveals its distinctive metabolic capacity, where the remains of different eras, both natural and artificial, are constantly reused and reinterpreted by the communities that inhabit them, leading to the emergence of alternative forms of urbanity. Rome demonstrates, in its chaotic and imperfect nature and in the informality of some of its processes, how the interstitial space generated and discarded by the city itself is a valuable space as an urban reserve for experimentation, within which to reconfigure the fragmentation of urban fabrics and social relationships.
Display downloads
References
Amar, Georges. Homo mobilis. Limoges: FYP éditions, 2016.
Amendola, Giandomenico. La città postmoderna. Roma: Laterza, 2005.
Amin, Ash and Nigel Thrift. Cities. Oxford: Polity, 2002.
Bassetti, Nicolò and Sapo Matteucci. Sacro romano GRA. Macerata: Quodlibet; Milano: Humboldt, 2013.
Branzi, Andrea. Modernità debole e diffusa. Milano: Skira, 2006.
Burdett, Richard. Infrastrutture, spazio pubblico ed edilizia di alta qualità nei processi di rigenerazione urbana a Londra. Techne 10 (2015): 19-23.
Clément, Gilles. Il giardino in movimento. Macerata: Quodlibet, 2011.
Corboz, André. Il territorio come palinsesto. Casabella 516 (1985): 22-27.
Gandy, Matthew. Natura Urbana. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10658.001.0001
Harvey, David. The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 1989.
Insolera, Italo and Paolo Berdini. Roma moderna. Torino: Einaudi, 2024.
Koolhaas, Rem. Delirious New York. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978.
Nicolin, Pierluigi. Paesaggi e infrastrutture. Lotus International 139 (2009): 16-23.
Niemelä, Jari. Is There a Need for a Theory of Urban Ecology? Urban Ecosystems 3 (1999): 57-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009595932440
Purini, Franco. Memorie verdi. Lotus International 157 (2015): 4-25.
Roger, Alain. Vita e morte dei paesaggi. Lotus International 101 (1999): 83-90.
Rossi, Aldo. L'architettura della città. Padova: Marsilio, 1966.
Secchi, Bernardo. Un’urbanistica di spazi aperti. Casabella 597-598 (1993): 5-9.
Soja, Edward William. Thirdspace. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 1996.
de Solà-Morales, Ignasi. Terrain vague. In Anyplace, ed. Cynthia C. Davidson, 118-23. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995.
de Solà-Morales, Manuel. Territori privi di modello. In Il centro altrove, ed. Raffaella Neri, 254-7. Milano: Electa, 1995.
Stavrides, Stavros. Open Space Appropriations and the Potentialities of a “City of Thresholds”. In Terrain Vague, eds. Patrick Barron and Manuela Mariani, 48-61. New York: Routledge, 2013.
Waldheim, Charles. A reference manifesto. In The landscape urbanism reader, ed. Charles Waldheim, 13-19. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2006.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 ZARCH. Journal of interdisciplinary studies in Architecture and Urbanism

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Accepted 2024-10-07
Published 2024-12-26